Friday, September 23, 2016

Can you Reduce your Soybean Planting Population?



University research has shown many times that it can be done, but yet, some growers are still uneasy. With today’s farm economy, I am getting asked about reducing soybean planting populations quite frequently. 


We usually start with a soybean planting populations of around 140,000 seeds per acre for 30 inch rows, but this will increase with narrow row spacing. For more information, check out information at Soybean Production in Missouri. You can start to decrease soybean population if you have excellent seed quality, seed treatment, pre and post residual herbicides, and ideal planting conditions. A target should be around 100,000 plants per acre as a final stand, and in some situations, you can get away with lower stands, without replant, if stands are consistent across the field. 


In the past several years, two Burrus dealers took my challenge to do some “on farm” testing to see if reducing soybean planting rates could work on their farm. This year, Burrus dealer Jason Zimmer, located near Reddick, did his own on farm trial. He planted 24 rows (not replicated) of Power Plus® 28H5™* treated with PowerShield® at planting populations of 75,000, 100,000, 125,000, and 150,000. The field was planted on May 6th into no-till, 30 inch rows, with a burndown, pre residual, and post of glyphosate. There was significant disease pressure this year! Here are the results:

75K – 62.9 bu/a

100K – 65.6 bu/a

125K – 65.6 bu/a

150K – 66.9 bu/a
*No significant yield differences in 100K, 125K, and 150K planting populations.



In 2015 Burrus Dealer, Pete Gill offered Burrus the use of 3 soybean plots to evaluate seed treatments and plant populations. Each of small plots were around 200 x 300 feet in size and located within cornfields, so the planting date remained the same on May 18th, 2015 and only received a post application of glyphosate. Each of plots were planted with 3 replications (6 row strips) of 3 different seed treatment mixes as well as untreated of the soybean variety PowerPlus® 32D5™*. Each of the plots consisted of a different soybean population: 70,000 140,000, and 200,000 seeds/acre. There was light weed pressure and possible residue issues that could have increased variability within these plots. Disease pressure was light. 



Every year will be different, but, recently weed and disease pressure have some growers spending additional input cost towards residual herbicides and “game changer” seed treatments such as PS SDS (PowerShield® + ILeVO®), to gain cleaner fields and insurance against disease. With this added peace of mind, could we lower input costs by reducing seed costs? The answer is yes.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Meet Paige Ehnle - New Account Manager Trainee

Join us in welcoming Paige Ehnle as a Burrus Account Manager Trainee. Paige lives in Edelstein, Illinois on her family’s corn and soybean farm. Paige is a recent graduate of Illinois State University with a degree in Agriculture Education. After many experiences in the classroom, she quickly realized that she missed working with farmers on a daily basis.

Her farming background, in conjunction with the wide variety of experiences working in different sectors of the agriculture industry, will help her be an asset to your operation. She is looking forward to moving into a territory and getting to work with growers in the area to meet their specific needs.


 In her spare time, she loves to work on her family farm, bake, and spend time fishing up at their cabin in Minnesota. Growers can reach Paige at 309-645-1020 or at paige.ehnle@burrusseed.com.

Monday, September 5, 2016

Corn Fields Callin' It Quits: Check for Stalk Rot

After pollination, the corn yield potential is set.  We can't add to the corn yield potential, but we sure can try to preserve that yield potential!  Think of the corn leaves (especially the top leaves) as factories for photosynthesis and their job is to make sugars for plant growth, development and grain yield.  If there is leaf loss or stress at tassel or during grain fill, the corn plant may have a reduction in yield potential.


Northern corn leaf blight that has spread into the canopy beyond the ear leaf.
Earlier in 2016, it was critical that we scouted for fungal disease such as Gray leaf spot and Northern corn leaf blight to make sure it did not spread beyond the ear leaf.  Environmental conditions that consisted of rain, humidity, and specific temperature ranges were conducive for disease development.  A fungicide application may have been warranted on susceptible hybrids between the corn growth stages of tassel and brown silk (sometimes before dent if warranted) to try to preserve corn yield.  It has been well documented that the higher percentage disease on the plant, the greater the yield loss.  Research has also shown that if fungicides are applied at the right time, high disease pressure present at that time will increase your potential for a yield response from a fungicide, which can increase your return on investment.

There are many other stresses that can occur during ear development that can also cause plants to make less sugars such as lack of sunlight (cloudy days), drought, high plant populations (competition for light/reduced stalk), wind, hail, corn rootworm, corn borer (2nd generation), nematodes, corn planted after corn (higher disease), compromised roots from lack of oxygen (flooding) or root rot, nutrient deficiency (low N/ or high N with low K), high ear placement, or poor hybrid stalk strength.
Corn that has shut down due to stalk rots.

Unfortunately, corn could have undergone many of these stresses during the current growing season at corn kernel development.  The developing ears take priority and the amount of sugars that they require will depend on kernel number. Root and stalk tissue have lower priority, and if under stress, they will receive less sugar and weaken.  Hence, in their weakened state, root and stalk rot pathogens lurking in the soil/residue can infect and cause disease.
Corn that is infected with anthracnose stalk rot.
Stalk rot can cause the plant to die within 7 to 10 days, which in turn, causes poor ear fill or finished ears, increased ear rots in wet weather, yield reduction between 5 to 20%, as well as harvest losses.  Scout the entire field for stalk quality.  Remember that different soil types, soil drainage patterns, hybrids, and fertility can all be factors that could affect stalk quality.  

Check 10 plants by pinching  the second or third internode of the stalk above ground level.  Then, push the stalks and if they collapse easily, cut open the stalk to check for disease or insects.  Stalk rot could be lurking in just one area of the field or affect an entire field.  If more than 10% of stalks appear to have stalk rot, harvest these areas as soon as grain is physically mature with a slow combine speed.

Corn Residue Management Strategies



During harvest, many are concerned with the high amount of corn residue appearing within fields.  One of the main reasons that we are seeing a higher amount of residue is because of the higher yields.  A 200 bu/a corn crop can leave around 5 tons or 12,000 – 16,000 lb/a of residue on the soil surface. Corn produces over twice the amount of residue in comparison to other crops and more than twice the residue necessary to provide 100% soil cover.  There are other factors that have occurred over the past several years that have caused higher levels of corn residue such as higher plant populations, foliar fungicides, Bt traited products with higher stalk quality, reduced tillage, high fertility or productive soils, corn-on-corn rotation, as well as favorable environmental conditions that affect the rate of microbe decomposition. 

If residue is allowed to build on the soil surface, many problems can occur.  A high percent of residue on the soil surface can cause soil temperatures to remain cooler in the spring, which can result in emergence issues.  Poor stands due to delayed germination can also result due to residue in the seed furrow, especially in corn on corn rotations, because of poor soil to seed contact. Many diseases are harbored within residue and in some cases, alleopathy or chemicals leaching out from corn trash might delay early crop growth.  Lastly, nutrients, such as nitrogen can be tied-up within residue.

Residue can be a very important source of nitrogen, however, if a high amount of corn residue is present, immobilization will take place, which means that plant usable forms of nitrogen are tied up within the soil. Various soil microbes, depending on temperature, available oxygen, and moisture will decompose this residue into humus, and then organic matter.  Once residue is decayed, mineralization can take place, and plant available sources of nitrogen, such as ammonium (NH4), become available to plants.  Corn stalks consist of a carbon to nitrogen (C:N) ratio of 40 – 80 and in order to be broken down to humus by microbes, the C:N ration must be brought down to 10. 

The first point of trash escape into the field is via the combine at harvest.  Stalks, cobs, and chaff should be distributed evenly across the field as much as possible.  A dense mat of trash on the soil surface in the spring can delay soil moisture loss and soil warming.  The goal is to avoid thick residue in areas and bare soil showing in other areas of the field.  Choppers, batt, and chaff spreaders can help to spread and evenly distribute trash, which in turn, can increase the decomposition rate.  However, a chopper head can cost more, weigh more, and possibly over-process residue, which can lead to erosion issues.  Crushing knife rolls or tapered snapping rolls on the combine head can aid in processing residue by crimping, chopping, or crushing of stalks, which allows many points for decomposers to enter the stalk. Trash reduction kits added to a combine can help to reduce power usage and possibly help to increase speed at harvest.  Set the corn head higher, so that taller stalks remain standing to increase air movement down rows to encourage decomposition, but in a no-till operation, standing stalks can cause planting issues.  This also allows the stalk to remain intact and anchored into the soil, which helps to eliminate erosion. 

Some might choose to chop or mow down stalks, but one of the biggest problems is that trash can form a flat mat on the soil surface.  If trash is matted between rows, it is more likely to plug tillage and planting equipment later.  Be sure to choose a mower that will ensure an even residue distribution such as a flail mower and not a rotary mower, which can cause increase windrowing of residue that can hinder residue distribution. Chopped residue can be more easily washed away; therefore, erosion can ensue.  Some recommend that if you want to chop residue, just let the combine do this job.

Fall grazing or bailing corn residue are options for growers with livestock.  Along the same lines and another “hot topic”, is harvesting fodder for biofuel.  This can provide some additional income and can solve some planting equipment challenges.  The two issues that come along with these options are erosion as well as nutrient and carbon removal.  Corn stover can consist of around 17lbs of nitrogen (N), 4lbs of phosphorus (P), and 20lbs of Potassium (K) per ton and if removed, these nutrients will need to be replaced.  Carbon is critical when it comes to maintaining soil quality and productivity.  If you are a livestock grower, the removal of carbon and nutrients from the soil can replaced by adding manure.  However, those with just cash crops will need to replace nutrients by purchasing costly commercial fertilizer.  However, carbon is not as easily replaced in the absence of manure, especially in a corn-on-corn operation that is intensively managed.  Other problems that can result from fall grazing can be disease, compaction, reduced soil temperature in the spring, as well as germination problems. 

There are some who believe that liquid nitrogen, such as urea or ammonium sulfate broadcasted over the top of corn stalks or residue in the fall or with UAN in the spring, will increase their decompositions rate.  This theory is based on the process of nitrogen immobilization. Corn stalks consist of a higher amount of carbon over nitrogen.  In order for microbes to build their populations and decompose the corn stalks, they are in need of nitrogen to build their cells.  Research has shown that the addition of nitrogen to residue in the fall does not help to increase microbial populations, because temperatures are too cold for microbial residue breakdown to occur.  Therefore, if adding nitrogen to corn stalks in the fall, the limiting factor is not nitrogen, but low temperatures.  When liquid nitrogen is placed over the top of high residue in the spring, it can leach quickly and if temperatures are warm, up to 20% nitrogen loss can occur due to volatilization.  Soil microbes need to get their nitrogen from the soil; therefore it is recommended that sources of nitrogen be incorporated or injected to encourage decomposition. 

There has also been some talk of placing sugars or numerous other products, sometimes with liquid nitrogen, over the top of corn residue.  The idea is that the sugars provide a food source for microbes to feed on, while decomposing corn residue.  These sugars or other products are applied during the spring or fall in hopes that trash will breakdown before the next planting season.

The application of sugars often occurs south of I-70.  Some claim they work better in the south because there is a longer duration of warm temperatures for decomposition by microbes to take place.  There has not been much research or evaluation done  of sugars or other products.  Some say certain products work better with incorporation, but this could be because tillage alone encourages the breakdown of residue.

When managing residue, cultivation is most important because the incorporation of tillage within a farm operation will significantly increase decomposition rates by soil microbes.  Fall tillage decomposition rates are around 5 – 10% higher than spring tillage.  Additional tillage is often needed after the second year of corn to incorporate residue and speed up decomposition.  With cultivation, benefits can be warmer soil temperatures in the spring and less interference of residue during planting operations.  But, there also can be drawbacks when it comes to cultivation.  Some tillage equipment might not be equipped to handle high residue levels and cultivators equipped for high residue levels can cost several more dollars per acre if compared to conventional models.  In general, with tillage, there comes increased production costs and more soil erosion can occur with the decrease of residue.  Continuous no-till operations can also improve bio and microbial activity in fields, breakdown crop residue, and release nutrients back into the soil.  Of course, a no-till operation is much easier within a corn and soybean rotation.  The drawbacks of no-till are poor emergence during cold or wet springs, lower spring soil temperatures, and uneven crop debris across the soil surface.

            Ultimately, we should strive for “healthy soil” and one sign of a well maintained soil is earthworms.  Some ways that we can obtain a good healthy soil is a continuous no-till operation with a crop rotation, continue to return organic residues such as manure or compost to soil, and the use of cover crops when fields are fallow.  Cover crops can create a “micro climate” under its canopy that creates a moist environment, full of potential decomposers of crop residue. Not only do cover crops help to speed up the decomposition process, they also add biodiversity to corn residue, so they can feed microbes that, in turn, will feed on corn residue.  However, one must ensure that cover crops do not dry out soil or create additional, unwanted residue.

If residue is not managed, we must find ways to deal with increased trash on the soil surface at planting, so that it does not hinder crop emergence.  Some ways to deal with extra residue at planting is to mount tillage tools such as cleaning disks, sweeps, brushes, rolling finger, or plows.  The basic goal is to make sure that at least 1/3 of the row area consists of less than 10% residue.  In a continuous corn operation, row cleaners are needed to avoid seed contact with trash.  With strip-till, the use of residue cleaners or managers are used at planting in order to obtain an 8 inch zone that is free of residue.  If anhydrous is involved with a strip-till operation, there should be a 6 - 8 inch tilled zone to prevent nitrogen loss or other problems with seed germination.  In no-till, there can be issues with standing stalks when planting, so coulters, openers, gauge wheels, and press wheels might be needed.

Some claim that those with no-till operations should be weary of coulters, which cut residue, loosen soil, and reduce wear on seed furrow opener in abrasive soil.   If coulters are set too deeply, they can cause air pockets to occur in the seed zone.  If residue levels are too high in a no-till situation, some might run a residue mover up front and then follow that by a spoked residue mover.  Be sure that residue movers are not doing more harm than good, as some can move residue over the row which may hinder crop emergence.  There is no single management technique that will make this breakdown of residue occur, instead an integrated approach throughout the growing season during planting, nutrient application, and harvesting will be needed to be incorporated into a farming operation.

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Sudden Death of Soybeans in 2016 and PS SDS (ILeVO®) to the Rescue


For the latest on Sudden Death Syndrome in 2016, check out these recent articles:

2016 Forecast for Sudden Death Syndrome in Early Planted Soybeans, Stephanie Porter, Soy CCA Envoy, West Central Illinois


ILeVO® Halo Effect on Soybeans, Stephanie Porter, Burrus Sales Agronomist

Eyes on Beans:  SDS Symptoms Surfacing on Early Planted Soybeans, By Emily Unglesbee, DTN, The Progressive Farmer

SDS:  The Perfect Storm, By Jill Loer, Prairie Farmer 

Left) Power Plus® 39R5 Treated with PowerShield® and (Right) Power Plus® 39R5 treated with PS SDS (PowerShield® with ILeVO®) in Schmalshof soybean plot near Avon, IL

There are two Burrus soybean plots planted by the Schmalshof family near Avon, IL.  The earlier soybean plot that was planted on April 14th, 2016 has Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) disease pressure.  The later planted soybean plot, which was planted on May 20th, 2016 is not showing signs of disease at this time.  There are two soybean varieties with and with PS SDS (PowerShield® with ILeVO®) seed treatment.  Check out for yourself how the PS SDS seed treatment is protecting this soybean variety, Power Plus® 39R5, planted on the right, from SDS:  

video
    "Over the course of five years and 350 company and university field trials, ILeVO has shown an average yield gain of 4.6 bushels per acre. When SDS symptoms are light, the yield bump drops down to 2.9 bu./A and in severe pressure, it rises as high as 10 bu./A, according to a company presentation." - Emily Unglesbee, DTN Staff Reporter